This can happen in more than one way:
- By Obscure haughtiness of evil I mean what there is of escaping from total punishment because the only one to know how to work such evil for h** own benefit can now and then be only the first one to establish that evil h**self.
- The indirectness of evil I speak about here is about that by brainwashing, seducing and/or otherwise influencing others to do evil a person can oftentimes more or less smartly escape penalties in reciprocity - at least immediate ones.
If someone hinders justice from being completely just, reciprocity about doing so can sometimes not be completely just. It can very often have to include injustice against that person. One can call this that the person has then, thereby, made a soul sale.
This type of a soul sale is similar to what is described in Christianity, as well as other Abrahemic religions. Indeed I've gotten my notion of it from there. But there's an essence of it there of something that is into a more or less rough division into soul or not. I don't believe in that sort of simplification - on the contrary, there is much reason to resent it!
Firstly, it does not allow for justice to be as close to completion as it can be. Secondly, very often, much resentment can grow among those who seem deemed to what can be called 'hell' according to the above-mentioned rough division. Thirdly, those who can view themselves as less punishable are very often tempted to pertain to superficiality for the sake of keeping that view on themselves. It is more so with belief in a rough division than with belief in a more nuanced and fair one, because the rough division leads to that they feel they have the right to also simplify. Moreover, some may react to others that seem to them to simplify in one way, about for example the borders to purgatory, to try to compete with them with their own simplification. ...
The last-mentioned problem, at least, is worsened to the extent the rough division is defended, as in for example Christianity, as right, based on that it is quick as a response to someone's wrong-doings. The same holds true about when it is made to seem righteous because of its decisiveness or so. All in all, Christianity, and similar religions tend to scare people into believing evil is good.
But very often people seem frightened to admit that someone who sees their soul punishment come in small doses is not about trying to pretend to have the right to nag h** way into punishing the other one - as if it were rough punishments that person believed in!
But the truth is, as I, at least, can see it, that justice does not come from the rough-division of heaven, hell and that purgatory (which they seem to have it is basically on the border between the two!), but from the small steps that really do regard exactly to which extent the person has obstructed reciprocity from coming to be.
In that simplification claims about the afterlife, which yield such rough-division notions, can obstruct justice, they too can lead to soul sale. The issue about them is complex, however, in that those simplifications also lead to much emphasis about that soul sales are harmful and very often should be taken seriously as destructive both for the victim/-s and perpetrator/-s, the latter of which eventually become victims of themselves. Thereby, justice is not always served - at the very least not quite easily. - about the potential damage of such claims.
It is also complicated that some other soul sales, too, are similar in that they fit some pattern or another of morals - and that this makes them difficult to punish justly. However, they too will sooner or later met by reciprocity. Also, in our type of reality, there is fairly little power of the type that is based upon that kind of tampering with Godly reciprocity.
Something we do have are many varying types of soul sales, which can be smaller or larger. The larger sales sometimes lead immediately to something of a point of no return. But, at the same time, the return is an almost to the extent there has been too much manipulation of the perpetrator for this person to be of very actual guilt of that sale. ...
Smaller soul sales, too, can contribute to closeness to the above-described state of perhaps no return. Both those and larger ones are, like karma,a debt due to guilt. Any size soul sale can and should, to the extent there's someone else, who has manipulated, who is of the actual guilt, result in that this person owes the first ower about the guilt. Usually that happens fairly soon. Sadly it sometimes takes long, occasionally very long, before that justice is met.
Indirectness of Evil
Indirectness cases of evil hinders that karma only hinders evil from reproducing. in that the (direct) reciprocity is that the person who made someone else evil is made evil h**self. This leads to that evil must be reproduce in order for karma to be fulfilled. But even that reproduction of evil kan be reciprocally met, and thereby, it seems, reciprocity can be forced to counteract itself. Even so, support of karma, even in that sense can always be done in ways that do more good than harm. Such necessary evils can sometimes be mistaken for real evil though. ...
The Combined Problem
Evil that is both indirect and obscurely haughty can be mistaken for goodness - and it sometimes lasts for very long. I guess that what Abrahemic religions mean - or at least was initially meant - by "the Devil" is an entity of extreme capacity of achieving that. ... Perhaps part of that myth is that the Devil was supposed to be able to beat anyone else at such a game, and that no one else woud thereby be the winner in it - at least not for eternity, where the Devil is suposedly the one and only possible winner in that game of evil.
